This is the page you are looking at https://awandahl.github.io/choosing_journal/
This is a support page and tool box for the “Choosing a Journal” workshop.
Anders Wändahl email: aw@kth.se
Why should you do this?
- Find the best possible journal for exactly your topic/subject and your audience
- Find, compare and evaluate several journals in your field
- Find alternative journals to submit to (in the unlikely event that you are rejected)
- Find alternative journals that you didn’t know of before - just as an orientation
- Check time from submission to first decision and publication of the article, as well as the acceptance rate
- Avoid to submit to a shady publisher KIB video
You will eventually arrive to a well motivated decision of a journal where to send your manuscript and you can - with pride - say something like…
“I have choosen to submit to the “International Journal of Fracture” because it is perfect for my topic, they accept the kind of article I have written, the metrics of the journal seems to be fairly good in comparison to other journals in the same field, the journal is covered by the major databases in my field, there is an Open Access option and the APC will be covered by the KTH library, the turn-around-time and acceptance rate seems fairly decent and my supervisor is also happy about my decison. By checking all aspects of this journal I also know that it isn’t among the shady journals that sometimes are called predatory.”
When submitting, you can also clearly state why your manuscript fits the scope of the journal in the cover letter. _____
0. Follow the publishing tradition at your department or in your research group:
Usually there is a very good reason why many of your colleagues publish in the same journals again and again. The obvious reason for this is that these journals are specialized forums for exactly the topics that you are investigating. Most of the experts in the field may use the same venue, and you or your supervisor may even know the editors personally. These journals are places for relevant scientific conversations. We can call this “publishing in the comfort zone”.
1. Find a candidate based on topic/subject, article type and study type:
The aim is to enter an abstract, and possibly a title and some keywords into a database and get examples of journals that has published in similar topics before.
Read About the Journal (Aims & scope) - Read Instructions for Authors
General non publisher-specific databases:
-
Web of Science Master Journals List Manuscript Matcher
Login required (free). Click on the "Match Manuscript" button and login.
-
JANE
Biomedicine only, paste in your abstract and search
-
JOT
Builds on JANE search results (biomedicine), gathering articles and their similarity scores from separate searches of the title and abstract text. The app presents scores, aggregated similarity statistics, and several flavors of journal impact metrics to help inform the choice of suitable target journals for your manuscript. Bilt by the Yale School of Public Health.
-
B!SON
B!SON helps you to find a suitable Open Access journal for your publication by using semantic and bibliometric methods.
Publisher specific:
2. Check coverage/indexing in major bibliographic databases (database indexing)
The aim is to check that my journal is covered in as many databases as possible. The reason for this is that you really want to findable and visible by your colleagues. If you know that your colleagues use a specific database when they look for information in your topic, then make sure that your upcoming article will be included in that source. The information about the specific databases that cover a specific journal is called “database indexing” in librarian lingo.
- Remember that Google Scholar isn’t a major bibliographic database even though it’s a very common tool for information searching!
- Note that database indexing often is indicated on the journal webpages, see example at T&F.
General databases:
-
MIAR
Comprehensive database of 40.000+ journals and their database coverage. From Universitat de Barcelona
-
Web of Science Master Journals List
A.k.a. Science Citation Index. Journal's "profile pages" are visible after login
Subject specific:
Ei Compendex (find excel-sheet on page)
GEOBASE (find excel-sheet on page)
Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts
Materials Science & Engineering Database
MathSciNet
Click on the journals tab
3a. Check journal ranking in your subject
The aim is to compare different journals in terms of the average number of citations received. This is called the Impact Factor in common language.
- Remember to never compare two journals from different subject areas unless the indicator used is field-normalized
- Journal Citation Indicator (JCI), SJR and SNIP are field-normalized, JIF and CiteScore are not.
- Indicator = SNIP
- Based on citation data from Scopus and Web of Science
-
Indicator: Journal Impact Factor (JIF) and Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)
-
Based on citation data from Web of Science
Scimago Journal & Country Rank
- Indicator = SJR
- Based on citation data from Scopus
- Indicators: 2, 1, 0 or X (2 is the best, X is for “questionable” journals)
- Based on expert panels
3b. Check conference ranking in your subject
The aim is to compare different conferences in terms of different “impact” scores.
- Remember to never compare two conferences from different subject areas.
- Choose “Source Type” = “Conference Proceednings” in the left hand menu
- Indicators = CiteScore, SJR, SNIP
- Based on citation data from Scopus
- Old ranking but may be useful
- Indicators = Excellence in Research in Australia (ERA 2010), Qualis (2012), Microsoft Academic Graph (2014)
4. Check the Open Access options
The aim is to check wether the journal you have in mind has any option for Open Access publishing (OA). To publish OA has become the norm and most research funders require that your research results is in the open, for everyone to read.
-
Publish Open Access - we cover your costs (KTH Library)
5. Check the funders’ and journals’ Research Data requirements
The aim is to find out if your research funder has any special research data requirements. Some journals and publishers also have demands when it comes to accompanying data. One very basic requirement is that you at least should have a plan for how you handle your data, a so called Data Management Plan (DMP).
-
Frontiers: Policies and Publication Ethics
Go to 2.4.2 Availability of Data
-
Springer Nature Data Policies FAQ Springer Nature Journals’ data policy
-
Taylor & Francis: Data sharing policies Taylor & Francis: Data availability statements
6. Check Acceptance Rate, Turn-Around-Time, Peer Review and editorial policies
The aim is to find the average time it takes from the moment you submit your manuscript to the first decision, possible acceptance and finally real publication. Another number that is of interest is the likeliness that your manuscript is accepted, the so called acceptence rate. The acceptance rate is usually much lower in high ranking journals. It’s also useful to know a little about the peer-review process.
Read About the Journal (Aims & scope) - Read Instructions for Authors
- Scholarly Kitchen 2020: “Guest Post - Author-Friendly Journal Websites” by Jerry A. Jacobs
-
SciRev
Researchers sharing their experiences - non-profit
- Springer
Read about impact factors and turn-around time on the journals' webpages
Peer review
- Transpose (ASAPbio)
A database of journal policies on peer review, co-reviewing, and preprinting
Editorial policies
- Responsible Journals - Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies (PREP) (CWTS)
Facilitates journal editors to become transparent about their editorial procedures
7. Publication ethics
Define the roles! Are all authors really “authors”? There are other ways to contribute to a journal article than being an author:
CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy)
Beware of salami slicing: “If I have several results on one topic, should I put all the results and submit it to a high impact journal, or separate them into several papers and submit it to standard impact journals? Which one is better for both academic impact and future career development?”
- Miguel Roig: Avoiding Plagiarism, Self-plagiarism, and Other Questionable Writing Practices: A Guide to Ethical Writing
- Nature Materials 2005: The cost of salami slicing
8. Other aspects on your choice of journal
-
KTH policy for publishing
-
Publishing tradition at your department
-
Your supervisor
-
Possibility to suggest peer-reviewers
Thesis content and article publishing
https://libraries.mit.edu/scholarly/publishing/theses-copyright/theses-and-article-publishing/